Are Vaccines More Dangerous for Families With Autoimmune History
You know almost how individuals proceeds control of the power of the Land and and then corruption that power like former U.s. President George "Dubya" Bush? "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some US businesses. He accomplished this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Iraq did non and when it had already been bombed into oblivion past the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Republic of iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush UK The Telegraph Past Chrissy Iley 15 February 2011.
Think how Bush was supported by UK Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did non be merely which Blair claimed could exist deployed within forty minutes and posed a serious security threat?
If you remember that then you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media. Notice how they persuade u.s.a. nosotros are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin save u.s. all if we trust them?
This trickery is not new. It had been used for well over a century with smallpox. The myth continues to this twenty-four hours.
On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated past vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically. The demise of the illness came nearly equally a result of the interaction of three completely dissimilar factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living weather condition, particularly diet and sanitation. The effect cannot exist attributable to the smallpox vaccine – whatsoever vaccine which takes over 100 years to piece of work ipso facto proves itself not to accept:
Pocket-size Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication
There was a nasty disease called smallpox and information technology did kill people long ago.
This was particularly the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and high-strung them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London's beginning park congenital after rich feared affliction spread from slums United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland The Contained Past Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized Globe.
The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the Country would keep them condom from the threat of disease. The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would exist vaccinated and the disease controlled. The problem was this was a myth only the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.
Smallpox vaccination did non piece of work and sometimes killed as many or more than the illness itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, Uk, USA, Sweden.
At present yous can read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:
Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013
SMALLPOX Bloodshed- UK, U.s.a. & SWEDEN
In the graphs below find the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself. Past 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself. The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, equally the medical "consensus" view tells united states. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not. On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.
When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the Uk and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table below]. Leicester's approach also price far less.
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]
Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" Past J.T. Biggs J.P.
[Download Entire Volume as .pdf 43 Mb – Or Read Online]
Tabular array 21
SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.
| Name. | Period. | Modest-Pox. Cases | Small-Pox. Deaths. | Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases |
| Nippon | 1886-1908 | 288,779 | 77,415 | 26.viii |
| British Army (United Kingdom) | 1860-1908 | one,355 | 96 | vii.i |
| British Regular army (India) | 1860-1908 | 2,753 | 307 | 11.1 |
| British Ground forces (Colonies) | 1860-1908 | 934 | 82 | eight.8 |
| Purple Navy | 1860-1908 | 2,909 | 234 | 8.0 |
| Grand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all | 296,730 | 78,134 | 26.3 | |
| Leicester (since giving up vaccination) | 1880-1908 | 1,206 | 61 | 5.i |
Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-charge per unit separately and together, and then that they may exist compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—just on the opposite side."
TABLE 29.
Pocket-sized-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared
| Vaccinal Condition | Small-Pox Cases | Modest-Pox Deaths | Fatality-charge per unit Per Cent | Cost of Epidemic | |
| London 1900-02 | Well Vaccinated | 9,659 | 1,594 | 16.50 | £492,000 |
| Glasgow 1900-02 | Well Vaccinated | 3,417 | 377 | 11.03 | £ 150,000 |
| Sheffield 1887-88 | Well Vaccinated | seven,066 | 688 | ix.73 | £32,257 |
| Leicester 1892-94 | Practically Unvaccinated | 393 | 21 | v.34 | £2,888 |
| Leicester 1902-04 | Practically Unvaccinated | 731 | 30 | 4.10 | £1,602 |
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]
__________________________________________
Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD
– August 27, 2013
With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, you might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the idea of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an effort to provide protection against contagious illness begin?
Many medical and history books present a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a simple country md and his courage in attempting to thwart a mortiferous and frightening illness of that time – smallpox, or as information technology was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the writer reiterates this classic tale.
In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year old male child named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps's hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, merely nothing more than. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, admitting balmy, instance of the disease. Cipher happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more than; again, cipher. [1]
Edward Jenner's idea somewhen became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, just somewhen the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would exist freed from the terror of the disease.
Such is the stuff of legends. The story is non unlike the archetype Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a mortiferous enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the mortiferous enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in identify, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]
But legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to support a belief, attain an iconic status while whatsoever unsavory aspects near the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.
The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the artillery of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with cognition of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This blazon of inoculation was only a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The idea backside inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better against the disease than if they contracted information technology at some maybe less desirable time and place in the time to come.
The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically good. But because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could just be afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did oftentimes assist protect the private that was inoculated, just in that location was all the same an estimated 2-5% that died as a result.[four,five] Even so, this was an comeback compared to a twenty-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] Only, was the departure in mortality due to inoculation lone? Or could it accept had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner surroundings than the majority of society?
There was one major and more often than not unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would accept been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious illness and that the practise of variolation would create new vectors to spread information technology. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years afterwards, and institute that smallpox deaths had increased⎯non decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, because information technology caused more deaths than lives saved.
It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practise of Inoculation apparently tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the place where information technology is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence information technology spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contamination are plain multiplied very profoundly by Inoculation . . .[seven]
All the same, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of information technology spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had get a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued by nigh of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to exist spread past this medically-sanctioned procedure.
Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-yr-quondam male child named James Phipps. He took affliction affair that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He subsequently deliberately exposed the child to smallpox as a test to see if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the male child did not contract clinical smallpox, information technology was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.
In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would exist immune to smallpox, at that place were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.
But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at information technology. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where pocket-sized-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [viii]
From the first there were problems with Jenner'due south process. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were so tested past being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox process had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect whatever of them. Jenner received the report merely decided to ignore the results because they were not in support of his theory.[9]
Vaccination was apace embraced by many in the medical profession as the answer to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical customs continued to cover Jenner's ideas amid numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that in that location were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were however dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.
A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A month later it was inoculated with small-pox matter without effect, and a few months later on took confluent small-pox and died. two. A woman-servant to Mr. Gamble, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years later on she became nurse to Yarmouth Infirmary, where she defenseless small-pox, and died. iii and iv. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted minor-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The kid of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's proper name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's office . . . died of pocket-size-pox a year after vaccination.[10]
Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A written report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Notation that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality charge per unit as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a directly challenge to this new and highly lauded medical process.
Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.
. . . the number of all ranks suffering nether Pocket-sized Pox, who take previously undergone Vaccination by the most adept practitioners, is now alarmingly great.[12]
In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practise." Just after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people still could contract and even dice from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practice.[13]
Similar today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a trend to embrace information technology as a new form of income. It is therefore quite pregnant for a md to have spoken out against information technology equally Dr. Brown did.
Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.
. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, 2 [1820-1822] at that place was a great hubbub most the small-pox. It broke out with the great epidemic to the north . . . It pressed close to abode to Dr. Jenner himself . . . Information technology attacked many who had had small-pox before, and often severely; virtually to decease; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some lonely, only cruel upon bang-up numbers.[xiv]
William Cobbett was a farmer, announcer, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to exist an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:
. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed past JENNER HIMSELF, accept taken the real small-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]
During this fourth dimension vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, just as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed dominance, and there were calls to obtain fresh material direct from cows.[sixteen]
While the fable maintained that the vaccine cloth came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses chosen the "grease." From this and other beliefs, in that location were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow fabricated into a new disease.[18] This faulty belief would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.
In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow's udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later research determined that this was nothing more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[twenty]
Non only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but there were likewise reports of deaths from other causes shortly after vaccination. For case, a pare condition called erysipelas was a especially prolonged and painful style to die.
. . . a boy from Somers-boondocks, aged v years, "modest-pox confluent, unmodified (nine days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "modest-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; ii good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged ten weeks, and the son of a saccharide baker, aged thirteen weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]
Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could exist spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.
Outset I rejected the thought that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At present I do not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]
As it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In order to bargain with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]
These laws and compulsory vaccination did zilch to adjourn the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting effectually 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. After 1855, at that place were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the nigh severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no event at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the xx years before.
Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.
By this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection confronting smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would exist milder. Calls were so fabricated for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]
While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, in that location were those that spoke out confronting the process. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being fabricated by vaccinators. Immense fiscal proceeds combined with the strength of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.
The public vaccinators take received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the nowadays year they will get nearly a quarter million. Other sums, also, which I cannot name, take been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has always a quack remedy produced so much gain?
[26]
In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did non vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, fifty-fifty those who were vaccinated.
Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian state of war at that place were twenty-three 1000 four hundred and 60-9 cases of modest-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July xv, 1871 said:
Of nine thousand three hundred and ninety-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, six thousand eight hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and 1-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than one hundred and xx-two grand vaccinated persons accept suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]
Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine move. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the great sit-in in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester'south government, which had pushed for vaccination through the apply of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]
Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the depression vaccination rate would result in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]
Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their conventionalities that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually exist plagued with disaster never did come up to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[xxx] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were loftier.
The feel of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an heart-sore to the pro-vaccinists the globe over. Here is a great manufacturing town having a population of well-nigh a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an experience extending over a period of more a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]
While vaccination was often promoted as a safe procedure, information technology often acquired sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph three). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).
Graph two: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.
Graph iii: England and Wales full deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.
Graph four: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922
At the end of the 1800s, smallpox inverse its character. After the summertime of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high expiry rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a illness that killed 1 in v of its victims to 1 that only killed anywhere from i in 50 and later to as low as 1 in 380. The disease could even so kill, simply having become and so much milder, it was oft mistaken for various other pox infections or pare eruptions.
During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and subsequently gradually spread over the land. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was usually at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]
The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death rate was around xx%, as it had been historically. The tabular array also showed that subsequently 1896 the expiry rate fell off rapidly, starting with 6% in 1897 to equally low equally 0.26% by 1908. As the mild course of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, past this time, considered a mild disease of childhood.
. . . chickenpox, is a minor communicable disease of babyhood, and is importantly important because it frequently gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]
By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced little in the mode of symptoms, fifty-fifty though few had been vaccinated.
Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the grade of the disease is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent-minded, and the constitutional symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]
Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, in that location was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the last smallpox expiry in the United States in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.
A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, now beingness termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this affliction was estimated by the authors to be between 1 in xx,000 to one in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to 40%.[35] However, they best-selling that most cases were not reported and at that place was no accurate accounting on this upshot of vaccination. There were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths equally the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the same fourth dimension there had only been 1 smallpox decease in 1948.[36]
The final smallpox expiry in the U.s.a. following an importation occurred in 1948, just since that time in that location have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]
Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military father after the begetter was vaccinated. After a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including allowed globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The female parent also required treatment and virus was found all over the business firm.[38]
Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 written report thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been even college. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a country with a modernistic wellness-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present beyond the entire earth?
There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.
Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and mayhap afraid that if we did the accident of some future epidemic might put u.s.a. in the incorrect. We prefer to permit compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attending is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]
During this time with vaccination every bit virtually the only medically promoted manner to deal with disease, at that place were doctors finding astonishing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a mutual nutrient product that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.
D. M. Oliphant, Yard.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the employ of Acetic acid in reddish fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to small pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more than reliable as a condom in small-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed 2 table-spoonfuls of vinegar, afterward breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the rubber handling died, while among those under ordinary treatment the mortality was as usual.[40]
In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's power to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to have intendance of other people with smallpox without fright of contracting the affliction. The writer notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]
Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a existent preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple tree cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should exist used three or four times a twenty-four hours to protect a person from contracting smallpox.
J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the not bad men who for a century by have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the forepart in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fear of smallpox if he will take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar iii or four times a twenty-four hours." The discussion may now be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]
Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, but just considering near people have been conditioned to accept the age-sometime prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, affliction-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal's (normally a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human being arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?
Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or merely an extremely poor or unbalanced nutrition. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of good for you collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and as well gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar property cells together and, equally a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.
William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of Male monarch'southward College, described the poor diet of gilt miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-scarce diet led many to develop scurvy.
Scurvy has been very prevalent among the golden miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour fabricated into concoction-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is done down with copious librations of strong java, and big quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sunday, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the aforementioned time subjected to the most intense labour.[43]
Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated ten,000 men died from scurvy.
During the American Civil War twice equally many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases every bit those killed in boxing.[44] For case, the causes of decease listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at least 2-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next mutual cause of decease, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for merely a small-scale fraction. Those who were killed in bodily battle or who died as a effect of their wounds accounted only for i pct of the total deaths.
Other large infectious killers such every bit scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known as pertussis) all profoundly declined during this fourth dimension to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild babyhood illnesses past the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & 6).
Graph v: England and Wales whooping cough mortality charge per unit from 1838 to 1978.
Graph vi: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.
The fairytale legend of a country doc making a discovery that saved the globe from the devastation of smallpox is a key medical belief that continues to be echoed past indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine organized religion. Simply the true history shows us a different reality.
The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the earth psyche as something to protect someone from an disease. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the aforementioned notion of injecting whole or parts of affliction matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific illness. The reality of vaccination is zip close to the myth.
Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, diet, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal commonage memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's great discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are at present a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the proper noun of supposedly healthier people. At present that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more than and more vaccines seem like a adept idea to yous?
More than data on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies tin be constitute in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can exist plant on amazon.com
Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Scientific discipline the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
iv.Frederick F. Cartwright, Affliction and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
five.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Country of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
vi.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
seven."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman'south Mag and Historical Relate, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Confronting Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
ten.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
xi."Vaccination past Human action of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. VIII, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present Country of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
xvi.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Nowadays State of Vaccination in French republic," The Lancet, vol. Ii, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Dr.-chirurgical review and periodical of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
xviii.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, Doc, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United States," Transactions of the American Medical Clan, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
twenty.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Midweek, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. four, Feb 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-scale-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Spotter, April 1911, vol. nineteen, no. four, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. W. Harman, Doc, "A Physician's Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Cursory: A Monthly Periodical of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. one, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Confronting Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Apr 16, 1885, p. 380.
thirty.J. W. Hodge, Md, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. W. Hodge, Physician, "How Minor-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. sixteen, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Disease equally Shown by the History of Smallpox in the The states," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.Five. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Toll Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume one, Due west.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Physician and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Play a joke on, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January ane, 1938, pp. 48-49.
twoscore."Acetic Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Preclude Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. Six, no. ane, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of Rex's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), Nov 26 1908, pp. 73-102.
Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, regime, Wellness, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Harm, Vaccines |
mactierdideentele.blogspot.com
Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/